They Saved $5 Billion and Sentenced 9.4 Million to Die — One Year After USAID's Dismantling, Global Health's Last Line of Defense Is Crumbling
Summary
One year after USAID was dismantled, The Lancet projects 9.4 million additional deaths by 2030. HIV clinics across Africa shut overnight while developing nations' health systems collapse in chain reaction — and no country is stepping up to fill the void.
Key Points
Lancet Projects 9.4 Million Additional Deaths by 2030
A study published by The Lancet medical journal in February 2026 projects 9.4 million additional deaths worldwide by 2030 if current aid reduction trends continue. Approximately 2.5 million of those projected deaths are children under five, who will die from malaria medication shortages, halted nutrition programs, and delayed vaccinations. The Center for Global Development independently estimates that 500,000 to 1 million people already died in 2025 alone due to aid cuts, demonstrating this is not merely a forecast but an ongoing crisis.
PEPFAR Suspension and African HIV Treatment Collapse
PEPFAR, the world's largest HIV program that provided antiretroviral therapy to approximately 220,000 people daily, has been substantially suspended following USAID's dismantling. HIV clinics across South Africa, Malawi, Tanzania, Zimbabwe, and Uganda informed patients they could no longer provide medication. In South Africa, suspended programs accounted for over 75% of total health resources, with modeling projecting 565,000 new infections and 601,000 additional deaths over the next decade. Treatment interruption also creates a secondary crisis of drug-resistant virus emergence.
Aid Domino Effect — Europe Follows America
America's aid cuts were not an isolated event but the start of a global domino effect. When the US slashed foreign aid, the UK, Germany, and Canada followed with their own budget reductions. Foreign aid has a structural characteristic where one country's withdrawal creates permission for others to cut back, resulting in a collective shrinkage of global aid. The Lancet's 9.4 million death projection includes this compounding domino effect from multiple donor nations pulling back simultaneously.
China Is Not Filling the Void
Despite expectations that China would capitalize on America's retreat, the reality is the opposite. According to NPR, China is approaching the situation very prudently, and Devex found zero cases in Asia where China directly replaced USAID funding. Brookings Institution analysis shows China views foreign aid as a political influence tool rather than health infrastructure investment, giving it no incentive to operate large-scale programs like PEPFAR. The world's largest health aid gap remains unfilled.
The Cost-Benefit Paradox — Saving 0.2% While Inflating Security Costs
USAID's health budget of approximately $10-15 billion annually represented less than 0.2% of America's $6.5 trillion federal budget. A single F-35 fighter jet at $80 million could keep tens of thousands of HIV patients alive for a year. Yet this savings is generating political instability and migration crises in countries with collapsed health systems, potentially costing America far more in security spending. During the 2014 Ebola crisis, US emergency deployment exceeded $5 billion — saving on annual PEPFAR spending while risking larger crises creates a losing calculation.
Positive & Negative Analysis
Positive Aspects
- PEPFAR Limited Waiver Maintained
Since February 1, 2025, PEPFAR has operated under a limited waiver allowing core services including HIV treatment, PMTCT, PrEP for pregnant women, and HIV testing to continue. While critics note the narrow scope, this is unquestionably better than complete termination. The waiver may be extended, maintaining at minimum a lifeline for the most critical services.
- Catalyst for Self-Sufficient Health Systems
Some developing nations are treating this crisis as a turning point for building self-sufficient health systems. Countries like Rwanda and Kenya are experimenting with increased domestic health budgets and reduced aid dependency. The Center for Global Development identifies expanding domestic health financing as the only sustainably viable long-term path. Crisis may serve as a catalyst for structural change.
- Strengthening Multilateral Health Governance Discussions
The revelation that one country's decision can shake global health has intensified international discussions about strengthening multilateral governance. World Bank IDA crisis window expansion, redefined roles for the Global Fund and Gavi, and EU-level independent health aid expansion are all under active consideration.
- Growing Recognition of Aid Dependency Risks
This crisis has starkly revealed how dangerously dependent developing nations' health systems were on a single country. This growing awareness may serve as the first step toward building a healthier global health architecture based on distributed governance and nationally-led health financing.
Concerns
- Drug-Resistant HIV Global Spread Risk
Patients whose treatment was abruptly terminated face high probability of developing drug-resistant viral strains, potentially producing super HIV that existing medications cannot treat. WHO has flagged first-line drug resistance exceeding 10% in some African nations. If this rises to 20-30%, the entire global HIV treatment strategy requires fundamental redesign affecting developed nations too.
- Irreversible Health Worker Exodus
Tens of thousands of local medical professionals employed by USAID programs are emigrating or switching careers following program termination. An entire generation of trained nurses, doctors, epidemiologists, and lab technicians is vanishing within 2-3 years. Rebuilding this specialized workforce requires a minimum of 10-15 years. Buildings can be reconstructed, but people cannot be produced by simply injecting funds.
- Simultaneous TB and Malaria Resurgence
TB and malaria bounce back immediately without continuous management. TB detection rates have plummeted following USAID cuts, enabling invisible transmission. TB commonly co-infects with HIV, and simultaneous collapse of both programs creates synergistic mortality explosions. Experts project sub-Saharan African TB incidence could rise 15-25% by end of 2026.
- Health Crisis Translating to Political Instability
Countries with collapsed health systems face eroding government trust and rising extremism. West Africa's Ebola crisis demonstrated how health emergencies trigger political upheaval. Currently, 26 of the most vulnerable nations face this prospect simultaneously, potentially feeding migration crises and terrorism that threaten US security itself.
- Structural Weakening of Pandemic Response Capacity
USAID infrastructure served as an early warning and response system against future pandemics. Its collapse means new infectious diseases cannot be detected and contained early. COVID-19 proved diseases starting in distant countries can paralyze the entire world within months.
Outlook
In the short term, over the next 6 to 12 months, the most pressing crisis will be the spike in mortality among patients whose HIV treatment was interrupted. Antiretroviral therapy interruption leads to rapid immune deterioration within months, triggering explosive increases in opportunistic infections. Countries most dependent on PEPFAR — South Africa, Tanzania, Uganda, Malawi — will see visibly rising HIV-related deaths from the second half of 2026 onward. As UNAIDS has warned, South Africa alone faces 601,000 additional deaths over the next decade, and that trajectory begins now.
Simultaneously, plummeting TB detection rates mean "invisible transmission" is spreading unchecked. TB requires active detection and treatment to halt transmission — when screening programs stop, patients do not decrease, they simply become invisible. Experts project sub-Saharan African TB incidence could increase by 15-25% by the end of 2026. Malaria follows the same pattern, with deaths surging in regions where preventive medication distribution and insecticide-treated net provision have ceased, especially coinciding with rainy seasons.
PEPFAR's limited waiver continues, but its narrow scope means HIV prevention education, community-based screening, and programs for sexual minorities have already been halted. These services classified as "non-core" are actually critical to long-term HIV control — their absence may not show immediate effects, but will return as an explosion of new infections within 2-3 years. This is a time bomb.
In the medium term, over 6 months to 2 years, structural restructuring of global health governance becomes unavoidable. This crisis has exposed the fragility of US-dependent aid structures, making the transition to a distributed multilateral governance model an inevitable conversation. However, this transition takes time. Expanded World Bank IDA crisis response windows, enhanced Global Fund and Gavi roles, and EU-level health aid expansion are all under discussion, but actually mobilizing funds and running programs on the ground requires a minimum of 2-3 years.
Evaluating the most realistic scenarios: the bull case envisions the US Congress partially restoring PEPFAR funding after the 2026 midterms, the EU and Japan expanding emergency health aid, and the African Union launching its own health fund. Even in this optimistic scenario, additional deaths by 2030 are merely "reduced" to 3-4 million. The base case assumes the status quo continues — PEPFAR's limited waiver extends but does not expand, other donor nations increase aid only marginally, and developing countries' own health financing expansion remains sluggish. In this scenario, the Lancet's 9.4 million projection becomes reality. The bear case sees the Trump administration revoking even PEPFAR's waiver, UK and German aid cuts accelerating, and an economic downturn shrinking multilateral funding. Deaths could exceed 9.4 million, reaching 12-15 million.
Looking 2 to 5 years out, this crisis is likely to evolve from a health emergency into a geopolitical restructuring event. Political instability intensifying in countries with collapsed health systems will feed into migration crises, extremism proliferation, and security destabilization. Paradoxically, America's attempt to "save money" by cutting aid could inflate its own security costs. During the 2014 Ebola crisis, the US emergency deployment cost exceeded $5 billion — trying to save $7 billion annually in PEPFAR spending while risking a crisis that could cost ten times that is a losing calculation.
The global spread of drug-resistant HIV also represents a long-term threat. Drug-resistant viruses emerging from patients with interrupted treatment could render first-line therapies globally obsolete. WHO has already flagged first-line drug resistance exceeding 10% in some African nations — if this rate climbs to 20-30%, the entire global HIV treatment strategy requires fundamental redesign. This directly affects developed nations too.
The brain drain of health workers compounds the long-term damage. Tens of thousands of local medical professionals previously employed by USAID programs are emigrating or switching professions following program termination. An entire generation of trained nurses, doctors, epidemiologists, and lab technicians is vanishing within 2-3 years. Rebuilding this workforce requires a minimum of 10-15 years. Buildings can be reconstructed, but people cannot be produced simply by injecting funds.
Ultimately, this crisis is not about "the crisis of foreign aid" but about "the crisis of the global public goods management system." Responding to global health threats like pandemics, climate change, and antimicrobial resistance demands international cooperation, yet the largest donor nation's withdrawal is shaking the system to its foundations. This is not exclusively a developing world problem. Viruses do not check passports. COVID-19 proved that. If the next pandemic originates from Africa's crumbling health infrastructure, the entire world pays the price.
Sources / References
- One year on from dismantling of USAID, study projects that global aid cuts could lead to 9.4 million deaths by 2030 — CNN
- Global aid cuts could lead to 9.4 million deaths by 2030, Lancet study says — Washington Post
- As US presence wanes, China works to increase its influence through foreign aid — NPR
- US cuts to HIV programs in sub-Saharan Africa pose global risk, experts say — CIDRAP
- 26 Countries Are Most Vulnerable to US Global Health Aid Cuts — Center for Global Development
- Impact of US funding cuts on the global HIV response — UNAIDS
- One Year Post-USAID, Global Health Funding Stuck in Limbo — Think Global Health